Erewash Council Tax 2026

How to read this stock pattern

Band D is a poor description of the largest group in Erewash's housing stock. The dominant group is Band A, where the statutory charge is two-thirds of the Band D rate, while the reference band describes a different part of the valuation list. The £1,914.11 stock-weighted figure is therefore the more representative area-level comparison. It does not predict an individual bill, because discounts, exemptions and the property's actual valuation band still determine liability.

This is a two-band centre rather than a single-band market. Bands A and B together contain 68.3% of dwellings, so neither band should be presented as a complete account of the area. The stock-weighted result combines both groups and the smaller tails into one comparable measure. The table shows where that mean comes from and prevents the distribution being flattened into an overconfident "typical property" claim.

Erewash falls in the lower quarter of the East Midlands stock-weighted ordering, below the regional median of £2,103.94. Its Band D figure may sit elsewhere in the national table, but applying the local stock mix produces a cheaper regional comparison. That difference is precisely why both measures are shown. Neither replaces an address-level bill, which depends on the property's valuation band and any applicable reductions.

Closest housing-stock shape: Great Yarmouth

Great Yarmouth is the closest full-distribution match for Erewash. The profiles are close rather than identical: 3.5% of dwellings would need to shift between valuation bands for their published shares to align. The comparison therefore tests the whole ladder, not just the largest band.

Four largest band differences

• The largest separation sits at lower Band C, where Great Yarmouth holds 18.1% of its stock and Erewash holds 14.9%. The peer is more bottom-weighted at this rung of the valuation list.
• A smaller distinction is lower on the ladder at Band B: Erewash has 26.9% of dwellings there, against 25.6% in Great Yarmouth. That extra lower-band weight pulls its stock profile away from the peer.
• A smaller distinction falls on the reference band itself. Band D contains 9.5% of Erewash's stock but 8.9% of Great Yarmouth's, so the national headline describes more of the local distribution here.
• A smaller distinction appears in the upper part of the ladder at Band E. Erewash places 4.6% of dwellings there versus 4.0% for Great Yarmouth, giving this profile the heavier upper-band tail at that point.

How the wider profile compares

Show every band direction

• Band A is closely balanced
• Band B leans toward Erewash
• Band C leans toward Great Yarmouth
• Band D leans toward Erewash
• Band E leans toward Erewash
• Band F is closely balanced
• Band G is closely balanced
• Band H is closely balanced

This sequence is read from the lowest published band to the highest.

Other close England matches for Erewash: Coventry (3.7% redistribution distance); Peterborough (4.1% redistribution distance); Walsall (4.4% redistribution distance); Plymouth (4.5% redistribution distance). Ranked across every published band in the England valuation system, this shortlist shows whether Great Yarmouth stands alone or sits in a cluster of similarly shaped authorities.