Reigate & Banstead Council Tax 2026

How to read this stock pattern

Here the standard Band D benchmark and the most common property group point to the same part of the distribution. That makes Reigate & Banstead less sensitive than most authorities to the familiar criticism that Band D is merely a reference property. The stock-weighted amount is still useful: it incorporates the lower and upper bands instead of treating the modal group as the whole area. It should be read as a corpus comparison, not as the bill of a particular address.

Reigate & Banstead has a broad valuation-band profile: the largest 3 groups are needed before the cumulative share passes half of the stock. No single band dominates the local picture, which makes a one-band headline especially incomplete. The weighted result is useful for comparing this authority with peers, but the spread across 8 published bands matters just as much. A broad mix also means the area-level mean is less representative of any one household than it is in a concentrated council.

Reigate & Banstead sits in the upper quarter of South East on the stock-weighted ordering, above the regional median of £2,511.00. This narrows the comparison from a UK rank to authorities facing the same broad regional context, while still correcting each one for its different band mix. The placement says the council's average published stock is relatively costly within that peer set; it does not convert the mean into an individual household charge.

Closest housing-stock shape: Guildford

Guildford is the closest full-distribution match for Reigate & Banstead. The profiles are close rather than identical: 3.7% of dwellings would need to shift between valuation bands for their published shares to align. The comparison therefore tests the whole ladder, not just the largest band.

Four largest band differences

• The largest separation sits at lower Band A, where Guildford holds 3.7% of its stock and Reigate & Banstead holds 1.9%. The peer is more bottom-weighted at this rung of the valuation list.
• A smaller distinction is an upper-band difference at Band H. Guildford records 3.0% of dwellings there, compared with 1.8% in Reigate & Banstead, so the peer carries more of its stock at that higher rung.
• A smaller distinction falls on the reference band itself. Band D contains 28.1% of Reigate & Banstead's stock but 27.0% of Guildford's, so the national headline describes more of the local distribution here.
• A smaller distinction appears in the upper part of the ladder at Band E. Reigate & Banstead places 18.0% of dwellings there versus 17.0% for Guildford, giving this profile the heavier upper-band tail at that point.

How the wider profile compares

Show every band direction

• Band A leans toward Guildford
• Band B leans toward Reigate & Banstead
• Band C is closely balanced
• Band D leans toward Reigate & Banstead
• Band E leans toward Reigate & Banstead
• Band F leans toward Reigate & Banstead
• Band G leans toward Guildford
• Band H leans toward Guildford

This sequence is read from the lowest published band to the highest.

Other close England matches for Reigate & Banstead: Brentwood (3.7% redistribution distance); Epping Forest (5.1% redistribution distance); Barnet (5.2% redistribution distance); Bromley (5.5% redistribution distance). Ranked across every published band in the England valuation system, this shortlist shows whether Guildford stands alone or sits in a cluster of similarly shaped authorities.