Wolverhampton Council Tax 2026

How to read this stock pattern

Band D is a poor description of the largest group in Wolverhampton's housing stock. The dominant group is Band A, where the statutory charge is two-thirds of the Band D rate, while the reference band describes a different part of the valuation list. The £1,993.02 stock-weighted figure is therefore the more representative area-level comparison. It does not predict an individual bill, because discounts, exemptions and the property's actual valuation band still determine liability.

The distribution is unusually concentrated: one band alone contains 50.3% of all published dwellings. That gives the modal-band comparison real descriptive weight and makes the gap between its charge and Band D easier to interpret. It also means the statutory charge shown for that band applies to the largest share of the local stock before discounts or exemptions. The table remains necessary because the other 7 bands describe the minority of properties that the headline cannot represent.

Wolverhampton occupies the middle half of the West Midlands stock-weighted distribution, below its £2,132.00 median. The regional result gives more context than a UK-wide rank without turning the difference into a superlative. It also shows that the council's band mix, not only its published Band D rate, determines where it sits among nearby authorities. The remaining distance from the median is an area-level comparison rather than a household saving or premium.

Closest housing-stock shape: Ashfield

Ashfield is the closest full-distribution match for Wolverhampton. The profiles are close rather than identical: 3.2% of dwellings would need to shift between valuation bands for their published shares to align. The comparison therefore tests the whole ladder, not just the largest band.

Four largest band differences

• The largest separation is lower on the ladder at Band B: Wolverhampton has 22.4% of dwellings there, against 20.6% in Ashfield. That extra lower-band weight pulls its stock profile away from the peer.
• A smaller distinction sits at lower Band A, where Ashfield holds 52.1% of its stock and Wolverhampton holds 50.3%. The peer is more bottom-weighted at this rung of the valuation list.
• A smaller distinction is at reference Band D: its share is 6.5% in Wolverhampton and 7.7% in Ashfield. The familiar benchmark represents a larger slice of the peer's housing stock.
• A smaller distinction appears in the upper part of the ladder at Band G. Wolverhampton places 0.9% of dwellings there versus 0.2% for Ashfield, giving this profile the heavier upper-band tail at that point.

How the wider profile compares

Show every band direction

• Band A leans toward Ashfield
• Band B leans toward Wolverhampton
• Band C is closely balanced
• Band D leans toward Ashfield
• Band E is closely balanced
• Band F leans toward Wolverhampton
• Band G leans toward Wolverhampton
• Band H is closely balanced

This sequence is read from the lowest published band to the highest.

Other close England matches for Wolverhampton: Knowsley (3.5% redistribution distance); North East Lincolnshire (3.6% redistribution distance); Derby City (3.8% redistribution distance); Salford (4.4% redistribution distance). Ranked across every published band in the England valuation system, this shortlist shows whether Ashfield stands alone or sits in a cluster of similarly shaped authorities.