Oxford Council Tax 2026

How to read this stock pattern

Oxford's largest property group sits in the lower half of the valuation ladder rather than at the Band D reference used in national tables. Its modal Band C charge is eight-ninths of the Band D rate, and 51.2% of the published stock lies below D. The headline alone does not show how often each band occurs. The stock-weighted amount applies the full distribution for an area-level comparison, while remaining an average rather than a household quotation.

This is a two-band centre rather than a single-band market. Bands C and D together contain 56.6% of dwellings, so neither band should be presented as a complete account of the area. The stock-weighted result combines both groups and the smaller tails into one comparable measure. The table shows where that mean comes from and prevents the distribution being flattened into an overconfident "typical property" claim.

Oxford occupies the middle half of the South East stock-weighted distribution, above its £2,511.00 median. The regional result gives more context than a UK-wide rank without turning the difference into a superlative. It also shows that the council's band mix, not only its published Band D rate, determines where it sits among nearby authorities. The remaining distance from the median is an area-level comparison rather than a household saving or premium.

Closest housing-stock shape: Haringey

Haringey is the closest full-distribution match for Oxford. The profiles are close rather than identical: 3.9% of dwellings would need to shift between valuation bands for their published shares to align. The comparison therefore tests the whole ladder, not just the largest band.

Four largest band differences

• The largest separation sits at lower Band A, where Haringey holds 6.7% of its stock and Oxford holds 4.7%. The peer is more bottom-weighted at this rung of the valuation list.
• A smaller distinction appears in the upper part of the ladder at Band E. Oxford places 12.1% of dwellings there versus 10.2% for Haringey, giving this profile the heavier upper-band tail at that point.
• A smaller distinction sits at lower Band B, where Haringey holds 16.9% of its stock and Oxford holds 15.5%. The peer is more bottom-weighted at this rung of the valuation list.
• A smaller distinction appears in the upper part of the ladder at Band G. Oxford places 5.3% of dwellings there versus 4.2% for Haringey, giving this profile the heavier upper-band tail at that point.

How the wider profile compares

Show every band direction

• Band A leans toward Haringey
• Band B leans toward Haringey
• Band C is closely balanced
• Band D leans toward Oxford
• Band E leans toward Oxford
• Band F is closely balanced
• Band G leans toward Oxford
• Band H is closely balanced

This sequence is read from the lowest published band to the highest.

Other close England matches for Oxford: Croydon (4.6% redistribution distance); Gravesham (6.4% redistribution distance); Chelmsford (7.2% redistribution distance); Rochford (7.6% redistribution distance). Ranked across every published band in the England valuation system, this shortlist shows whether Haringey stands alone or sits in a cluster of similarly shaped authorities.